The effectiveness of judicial oversight and legal texts in protecting individuals’ private property - expropriation as an example

Abstract

The right of ownership represents the means that gives the owner the authority that he exercises over his property in the face of all people. This right may be subject to infringement or abuse. The right of ownership is based on constitutional and legal foundations, and it is the basis for protecting this right, which was established for private funds and whose protection was guaranteed by the Constitution. In addition to legal protection for him, the law has given the owner of the property powers over his ownership.
He has the right to use the thing he owns, and he has the right to exploit it, and he also has the right to dispose of it. Protecting this right does not make it an absolute right that cannot be infringed, meaning that private property can be expropriated in some cases, in order to give priority to the public benefit of the group, including the case of “expropriation.” This is the process of expropriation. It is one of the serious restrictions affecting the ownership of individuals, which is why the national legislator gave importance to “judicial oversight” as a guarantee and means of controlling acts of expropriation through appealing expropriation decisions